Expert thinking on productivity, intangible asset valuation, growth strategy, and building more valuable businesses.
PE operating partners managing 5-15 portfolio companies face a new dimension of value creation: assessing which portfolio companies are building genuine AI intangible assets and which are pursuing fashionable but value-destructive AI-washing. Here is the assessment framework that separates signal from noise.
Read more →
Traditional productivity metrics were designed for an economy dominated by physical capital and tangible output. In a world where the most valuable firms derive their competitive advantage from software, data, brand equity, and organizational know-how, those metrics are increasingly unreliable. Here is why the gap matters — and what we should do about it.
Read more →
The San Francisco Fed's recent research on AI and productivity is among the most rigorous work in the space. But it also reveals critical blindspots in how economists measure the impact of AI on economic growth. Here is what they got right, what they missed, and why the measurement gap itself is the most important finding.
Read more →
Board oversight of AI investment is becoming as critical as financial controls. Here is the 10-point accountability checklist that separates effective board governance from box-ticking.
Read more →
Mergers and acquisitions involving artificial intelligence companies fail at a 62% rate in terms of value creation. The root cause is not market misjudgment — it is due diligence frameworks designed for physical assets, applied to intangible-asset-heavy technology companies. Here is the anatomy of that failure, and a framework that fixes it.
Read more →
Before we asked others to run their businesses through our AI intangible asset valuation framework, we ran Opagio itself through it. Here is what the data revealed about our own strengths, gaps, and surprises.
Read more →
After 30 years of helping businesses grow, scale, and sell to private equity, I have seen what separates businesses that achieve premium valuations from those that leave value on the table. Increasingly, the difference is intangible asset visibility. Here is how to prepare.
Read more →
Individual developers using AI copilots write code 30-55% faster. Individual analysts produce reports in half the time. Yet organizational productivity remains flat. The gap between task-level AI gains and enterprise-level outcomes reveals a measurement failure — and an intangible asset opportunity — that most firms are missing entirely.
Read more →
Every significant AI investment creates or enhances the same six categories of intangible assets I built during 15 years at IG Group. The problem is not that these assets do not exist — it is that no one is measuring them. Here is the framework that connects AI spending to enterprise value creation.
Read more →
I was at IG Group when Facebook's IPO was mispriced. The market overvalued the platform and undervalued the intangible assets — the data, the network effects, the advertiser relationships. Today's AI market is making the same mistake in reverse. Here is how to tell the difference between genuine AI value and bubble pricing.
Read more →
Only 29% of executives can measure AI ROI confidently. The problem is not that AI fails to deliver value — it is that traditional ROI frameworks were not designed for investments that create intangible assets. Here is the 4-layer framework that connects AI spending to board-level outcomes.
Read more →
The SEC has made AI-washing an enforcement priority, and for good reason: billions in capital are being allocated based on AI claims that range from exaggerated to fabricated. After 15 years evaluating technology claims at IG Group, here is the 7-point checklist that separates genuine AI capability from performative marketing.
Read more →Get the latest insights on intangible asset growth and productivity delivered to your inbox.
Get a free productivity assessment and discover where your biggest growth opportunities lie.