Why do lenders test separability, saleability and legal strength?
Short Answer
Because on default a lender must recover value from the IP alone. Separability, saleability and legal strength together decide whether the asset can be isolated, sold and enforced — which sets the loan-to-value.
Full Explanation
Lenders test separability, saleability and legal strength because collateral only matters when things go wrong. If a borrower defaults, the lender's recovery depends entirely on what it can extract from the pledged intellectual property on its own — not on the health of the business, which by definition has failed. These three tests answer the practical questions a recovery team faces, and together they turn a valuation into a security figure. Separability asks whether the IP can be sold or licensed apart from the business. An asset that is inseparable from the founder's personal expertise or bundled inextricably into day-to-day operations is hard to hand to a buyer. Saleability asks how readily the asset could be realised on default: is there a genuine market of acquirers or licensees, and how quickly. Legal strength asks whether title is clean, registered and enforceable — a registered patent or trade mark with a documented chain of title is far stronger than unregistered know-how, because the lender can prove ownership and stop infringers. This is why registered rights consistently carry more weight in lending decisions than unregistered ones. The reason all three are applied together, as a weighted blend rather than any single measure, is that a weakness in one undermines the others. A highly valuable asset that cannot be separated is poor security; a separable, saleable asset with defective title is a lawsuit waiting to happen. Lenders apply this blend to an orderly-disposal value — a controlled, non-forced realisation — which then sets the loan-to-value. It is also why serviceability matters more than collateral: operating cash flow is the primary repayment source, and over-reliance on collateral is a recognised underwriting failure. The IP is the fallback, not the plan. For a founder or adviser, the takeaway is to look at your IP the way a recovery team would. Ask whether each asset could be lifted out and sold, whether anyone would buy it, and whether your title would survive scrutiny. Opagio's collateral pack scores each asset against these three tests and flags the weak points, so you can strengthen title and evidence before a lender's credit committee does the testing for you.
Try It Yourself
Related Glossary Terms
Related Questions
EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation, and Amortisation) strips out financing and accounting decisions to show a company's core operatio...
Typically up to around half your independently appraised IP value, so a £4m valuation might support a facility of roughly £2m, subject to your cash fl...
Indicatively, IP loan-to-value runs from around 20-40% in the broader market up to roughly 50% for registered, insurance-backed rights, against an ord...
Want to see these concepts in action?
Discover how Opagio Intangibles puts intangible asset theory into practice.