IVS 210 vs RICS Red Book: Which for Lending?

Abstract editorial illustration of IP valuation standards for secured lending, evoking IVS and RICS Red Book methodology

In January 2024, NatWest became the first UK high-street bank to make IP-backed lending a standard product, lending from £250,000 in England and Wales at up to 50% of the IP's value as assessed by an independent valuer. But the cheque never turns on the valuation alone. It turns on which valuation standard the report was built to, and whether it answers the one question a credit committee actually asks: in a default, what could we recover?

That is where IVS 210 vs RICS Red Book stops being an academic distinction and starts deciding whether a loan gets approved. This guide sets out what each standard is, how they interlock, and what a lender genuinely needs on the desk before it will lend.

★ Key Takeaway

IVS 210 and the RICS Red Book are not competitors — they are complementary layers. IVS 210 governs how an intangible asset is valued; the Red Book governs the professional conduct and reporting around that valuation. For lending, valuers commonly draw on both, and a lender may ask for a liquidation premise with explicit downside sensitivity.

What IVS 210 Actually Is

The International Valuation Standards (IVS), issued by the International Valuation Standards Council, are the global technical rulebook for valuation. Within that framework, IVS 210 (Intangible Assets) is the asset standard — it governs how patents, trademarks, software, data and brands are identified, characterised and valued.

IVS 210 does not work in isolation. The 2025 edition renumbered the wider structure: reporting requirements moved to IVS 106 (previously IVS 103) and bases of value to IVS 102 (previously IVS 104). So a lending-grade intangible valuation typically cites IVS 210 for the asset, IVS 102 for the basis of value chosen, and IVS 106 for how the report is written up.

The IVS 210 Methods a Lender Will Recognise

IVS 210 accepts three approaches — income, market and cost — and several methods within them. These are asset-level methods for valuing a specific intangible under IVS 210; they are distinct from the investment- or company-level techniques used under IPEV-style fund reporting, and should not be conflated with them.

IVS 210 methods and where they fit

Method Approach Best suited to Lending note
Relief-from-Royalty (RFR) Income Brands, patents with licensing comparables Use the low end of the comparable royalty range
Multi-Period Excess Earnings (MPEEM) Income Customer relationships, bundled IP Apply contributory-asset charges; stress attrition
With-and-Without (W&W) Income Data, know-how driving a clear earnings uplift Model the "without" case honestly
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Income Cash-generative IP with a finite life Prefer finite life over perpetuity for collateral
Market Market Assets with observable transactions Rare for bespoke IP; use as a cross-check
Cost Cost Internally developed software, databases Gives a defensible liquidation floor

Two disciplines matter for lending. First, the discount rate should reconcile to the business's overall return through a Weighted Average Return on Assets (WARA) check. Second, economic life is not accounting life — a patent may be on the books for one horizon yet lose commercial force far sooner, and a Tax Amortisation Benefit may be layered in. For a fuller treatment, see valuing IP for secured lending.

What the RICS Red Book Adds

The RICS Red Book (formally the RICS Valuation – Global Standards) is the professional-conduct framework that RICS-registered valuers must follow. Two parts of the RICS framework matter for IP lending.

VPGA 6 is the Red Book's practice guidance application on the valuation of intangible assets, applying IVS 210. RICS also publishes a dedicated standard, Valuation of Intellectual Property Rights (2020, first issued as a guidance note and reissued in 2023 as a professional standard), and — most importantly for this discussion — that standard contains Appendix A, "Valuations supporting IP debt financing". Appendix A belongs to the IP rights standard, not to VPGA 6.

ℹ Note

Appendix A is the part written for lenders. It says that where the IP is used as collateral, the debt provider may wish the valuer to consider a liquidation premise, and that for an asset-backed financing decision it may be appropriate to value on current use and also on orderly liquidation. For early-stage technology and data IP it adds that the valuer should ensure a "most likely" value range does not obscure outcomes in which the IP could not service the debt, using judgement and sensitivity analysis to express a value range.

That emphasis reshapes the exercise. A fair-value report answers "what is this worth to a willing buyer?" A valuation prepared with Appendix A in mind also answers "what could a lender realise if this business fails?" — and those can be very different numbers.

How the Two Standards Relate

Think of it as technique versus conduct. IVS 210 tells the valuer which method to apply and how to derive the inputs. The Red Book tells the same valuer how to behave and how to report so that a credit committee is not misled, and Appendix A of the RICS IP standard flags the premise a lender may ask the valuer to consider. A robust IP lending valuation is therefore usually IVS 210-compliant in method and prepared with Appendix A in mind for premise and reporting.

In practice, valuers preparing for lending often use deliberately conservative inputs:

  • A royalty rate at the low end of the comparable range.
  • A discount rate carrying a risk premium for illiquidity and enforcement uncertainty.
  • A finite economic life, not a perpetuity.
  • A cautious terminal value, or none at all.
⚠ Warning

A valuation prepared for financial reporting or an M&A pitch will almost always be rejected as loan collateral. It is built on the wrong premise. Re-purposing a fair-value report as a lending report is one of the most common — and avoidable — reasons an IP-backed application stalls.

What the Lender Actually Needs

A standard-compliant number is necessary but not sufficient. A lender converts a valuation into a lending decision by applying three tests to the asset, then sizing the facility around cash flow.

The Three Lender Tests

Every credit team assesses collateral through the same lens: separability (can the asset be split from the business and sold on its own?), saleability (is there a realistic buyer universe in a distressed timeframe?), and legal strength (is title clean, unencumbered and enforceable?). An orderly-disposal value is only worth what these three tests say a lender could actually recover against it — which is what ultimately sets the loan-to-value. Registered rights carry more weight than unregistered ones for exactly this reason. The collateral suitability and orderly liquidation value concepts sit at the heart of this judgement.

Published UK IP lending ratios (October 2026)

Facility type Published advance
NatWest High Growth IP Loan Up to 50% of the IP value in its valuer's report
Royal Bank of Scotland IP-backed loans Up to 50% of orderly disposal value
Other lenders Set by each lender
IP within general ABL A marginal top-up, not the core

These are maximums, not commitments — every facility is priced to the specific asset, borrower and structure. See how much you can borrow against your IP and the IP loan eligibility criteria for the qualifying gates.

Cash Flow Is the Primary Repayment Source

Here is the point most borrowers miss: collateral is the fallback, not the plan. Operating cash flow is the primary repayment source; the IP is what the lender turns to only if servicing fails. That is why licensed IP with attributable royalty income is the preferred collateral — it is the asset and the repayment stream in one.

Lenders size the facility on serviceability. The Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR) — net operating income, or EBITDA less cash taxes, divided by total debt service — is the gate. Below 1.0 there is a shortfall; a minimum of roughly 1.20–1.25× is a common threshold, though it varies by lender and risk. Expect to provide two to three years of statutory accounts, current management accounts, a forecast, and — for IP-backed facilities — around three years of projections with sensitivity. The mechanics are set out in serviceability & DSCR.

Security Must Be Registered

A valuation and a serviceable cash flow still leave one gap: the charge itself. The strongest security over IP runs from a legal mortgage or assignment by way of security (with a licence-back), through a fixed charge by patent number, down to a floating charge. Whichever is used, it must be registered at Companies House within 21 days under s.859A Companies Act 2006 — miss that and the charge is void against a liquidator or administrator — and it should also be recorded at the UK IPO. The detail lives in security & charges over IP.

Bringing It Together for a Credit Committee

A lending-ready package weaves the standards and the tests into a single evidence trail: clean, unencumbered title with a documented chain of title; an independent IP audit confirming rights are in force; encumbrance searches at both Companies House and the UK IPO; an IVS 210 valuation reported, where the lender asks for it, on a liquidation premise (see Appendix A of the RICS IP standard) with ranges and sensitivity; and a serviceability case that stands on operating cash flow. The IP collateral due-diligence checklist and the borrowing base for intangibles show how each strand is assembled and tested.

Advisers preparing a client should start from preparing a client for an IP-backed loan and building the collateral evidence pack; borrowers weighing the route can compare debt vs equity for IP-rich clients.

The Bottom Line

IVS 210 and the RICS Red Book are not an either/or choice. IVS 210 gives the method; the Red Book gives the conduct and reporting discipline; and Appendix A of the separate RICS IP standard flags the liquidation premise a lender may ask for. A credit-grade valuation draws on all three: a lender-appropriate premise, cautious inputs, explicit downside ranges, and a clear read on separability, saleability and legal strength. Get that right and the three lender tests, the DSCR gate, and a properly registered charge do the rest.

To see whether your — or your client's — intangibles clear these hurdles, start by reading valuing IP for secured lending, then see what goes into an IP collateral pack for lenders and the wider lending standards & diligence hub. Advisers can begin at IP finance for advisers; borrowers new to the route should read the borrower's guide and the lender's guide to see both sides of the desk.

Share:

TH

Tony Hillier — Chairman, Co-Founder

MA, Balliol College, University of Oxford | Harvard Business School MBA with Distinction

Meet the Opagio team →

Connect on LinkedIn →

Try it yourself — Valuator

Estimate the value of your intangible assets using industry-standard methods like Relief from Royalty, MPEEM, and With & Without.

Open Valuator →

Related Articles

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest insights on intangible asset growth and productivity delivered to your inbox.

Want to learn more about your intangible assets?

Take the free intangible asset assessment to see where your business stands across Opagio 12.