Miss a single deadline and your carefully drafted security over a company's intellectual property can collapse into worthless paper. Under section 859A of the Companies Act 2006, a charge created by a UK company must be registered at Companies House within 21 days of its creation — or it is void against a liquidator, an administrator, and any other creditor of the company. The debt survives; the security does not. For a lender advancing against patents, software, or brands — assets that may represent the bulk of an SME's enterprise value — a lapsed registration is the difference between a secured claim and a place at the back of the unsecured queue.
This guide walks an SME founder and their adviser through how security over IP is actually created and perfected: choosing between a legal mortgage, a fixed charge, and a floating charge; meeting the mandatory 21-day Companies House filing under s.859A; recording the interest at the UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO); and understanding where you sit in the insolvency waterfall if things go wrong.
★ Key Takeaway
Creating security over IP is a two-step act. First you create it in the charge document; then you perfect it by registering at Companies House within 21 days and recording it at the UK IPO. A perfectly drafted charge that misses the s.859A window is void against a liquidator — the paperwork is not the protection; the timely registration is.
Why a charge over IP even arises
IP-backed lending is no longer theoretical in the UK. NatWest launched its High Growth IP Loan in January 2024 — the first UK high-street bank to lend directly against intellectual property — offering £250,000 to £10 million at up to roughly 50% of appraised IP value, with the assets valued and revalued annually by an independent valuer. HSBC UK assesses IP within a £250m growth-lending fund extending to £15m per facility. Across the broader market, indicative loan-to-value (LTV) ratios typically sit in the 20–40% range, reaching up to around 50% where insurance backing is present. These are indicative ranges, not commitments — every facility is underwritten on its own merits.
Crucially, for these lenders IP is a fallback form of security. The bank takes a charge over the IP so that, if the borrower defaults and conventional security is exhausted, there is a defined, registrable asset to realise. That charge only does its job if it is created correctly and perfected on time. For the wider mechanics of how banks assess these facilities, see the IP-Backed Loans UK hub and the detail on NatWest IP-backed loans.
How security over IP is created
Not all security is equal. UK lenders and their counsel choose among three principal instruments, ranked here from strongest to weakest for the lender.
Forms of security over intellectual property
| Instrument |
How it works |
Strength for the lender |
Typical use |
| Legal mortgage / assignment by way of security |
Legal title in the IP is assigned to the lender, with a licence-back so the borrower can keep using it; title reverts on repayment |
Strongest — the lender holds legal title |
Registered rights (patents, trade marks) of material value |
| Fixed charge |
Charge attached to specific, identified assets (e.g. by patent number); borrower cannot deal with them without consent |
Strong — ranks ahead of floating charges and preferential creditors |
Identifiable, high-value registered IP |
| Floating charge |
Charge over a shifting pool of assets (e.g. "all present and future IP"); crystallises on default |
Weakest of the three — ranks below fixed charges and preferential creditors |
Portfolios, unregistered rights, catch-all cover |
Registered rights carry more weight than unregistered ones because they can be pinned to a specific charge and searched by a lender. That is one reason a clean, documented chain of title matters so much: contractor and employee-created IP must have been properly assigned to the company before it can be charged. The Security & charges over IP standard sets out how lenders expect these instruments to be structured, and the IP collateral due-diligence checklist covers the encumbrance searches — at both Companies House and the UK IPO — that reveal prior charges.
Perfecting the charge: the s.859A registration
Creating the charge is only half the job. Section 859A of the Companies Act 2006 requires that a charge created by a UK company be delivered to the Registrar of Companies, with the prescribed particulars and a certified copy of the instrument, within 21 days beginning with the day after the charge is created.
Get this right and Companies House issues a certificate of registration that is conclusive evidence the filing was made in time. Get it wrong and section 859H bites: the charge is void against a liquidator, an administrator, and any creditor of the company — and, worse, the money secured becomes immediately payable.
⚠ Warning
There is no automatic "second chance" if you miss the 21-day window. Re-registration requires a court order under s.859F — a costly, uncertain application — and even then the court will typically protect creditors whose rights arose in the gap. Treat the 21-day deadline as immovable and diarise it from the date of creation, not the date of signing negotiations.
Two practical points advisers repeatedly get caught by. First, the 21 days run from creation of the charge, which is usually execution of the instrument — not from when the loan draws down. Second, registering at Companies House does not replace recording the interest at the UK IPO. For registered patents and trade marks, the security interest should also be recorded on the relevant IPO register so that third parties searching the register are put on notice and the lender's priority is protected. Both steps are part of a complete perfection process.
Where you rank if it all goes wrong
If the borrowing company enters insolvency, the order in which claims are paid — the "waterfall" — determines who actually recovers value. This is why the type of charge, and whether it was perfected, matters so much.
Indicative insolvency priority (highest to lowest)
| Rank |
Claimant |
| 1 |
Fixed-charge holders (from the charged asset) |
| 2 |
Insolvency practitioner's expenses |
| 3 |
Preferential creditors (certain employee claims, some HMRC taxes) |
| 4 |
Floating-charge holders (subject to the prescribed part set aside for unsecured creditors) |
| 5 |
Unsecured creditors |
A lender with a properly perfected fixed charge by patent number sits at the top of the queue for that asset. A lender relying on a floating charge ranks below preferential creditors and gives up a slice to the prescribed part. And a lender whose charge was never validly registered under s.859A drops out of the secured ranks entirely — into the unsecured tier at the bottom. The instrument you choose and the deadline you meet together determine your recovery. The Lender's guide and Borrower's guide both explain how this priority shapes the terms on offer.
How valuation sets the LTV behind the charge
A charge is only as useful as the realisable value of the asset behind it. UK IP valuations for secured lending follow IVS 210 (Intangible Assets), with the 2025 edition of the International Valuation Standards renumbering the reporting standard to IVS 106 and bases of value to IVS 102. RICS guidance — its "Valuation of IP rights" material and Red Book VPGA 6 — directs valuers to use an orderly-liquidation or forced-sale premise for collateral, and never to let a single "most likely" figure obscure the downside; sensitivity analysis and ranges are expected.
The income methods a valuer may apply — Relief-from-Royalty (RFR), Multi-Period Excess Earnings (MPEEM) after contributory-asset charges, and With-and-Without (W&W), alongside Cost, Market, and DCF approaches — are asset-level IVS 210 techniques, distinct from investment-level IPEV methods used to value a fund's holding. Conservative inputs are the norm for lending: a low-end royalty rate, a risk-premium-adjusted discount rate, a finite economic life, and a cautious terminal value.
ℹ Note
The security value that sets your LTV is not the headline "fair value" of the IP. It is a realisation-focused figure that reflects three lender tests — separability (can it be sold on its own?), saleability (is there a market?), and legal strength (is title clean and defensible?) — applied to an orderly-disposal value. Strong on all three, and the LTV holds up; weak on any one, and it compresses.
For the underlying methodology, see Valuing IP for secured lending and the glossary entries on orderly liquidation value and collateral suitability.
Serviceability: the charge is the fallback, not the plan
Lenders repay themselves from cash flow first and collateral second. Operating cash flow is the primary repayment source; the charge over IP is the secondary, fallback route. Expect to provide 2–3 years of statutory accounts, current management accounts, a forecast, and — for IP-backed facilities — around three years of projections with sensitivity analysis. The debt-service coverage ratio (DSCR) — net operating income divided by total debt service — is the headline serviceability test; a figure below 1.0 signals a shortfall, and minimums of roughly 1.20–1.25× are common indicative thresholds. See Serviceability & DSCR and the FAQ on how much you can borrow against your IP.
A pre-charge checklist for founders and advisers
Before a lender will take — and rely on — a charge over your IP, assemble the evidence that makes the security registrable and realisable:
- Clean, unencumbered title with a documented chain of title (all contractor and employee IP assigned to the company).
- An independent IP audit confirming the rights are in force (renewals paid).
- Encumbrance searches at both Companies House and the UK IPO.
- A collateral valuation on an orderly-disposal premise, with ranges and sensitivities.
- A plan to file at Companies House within 21 days of creating the charge — and to record it at the UK IPO.
Advisers preparing a client can follow Preparing a client for an IP-backed loan and Building the collateral evidence pack; the wider IP finance for advisers hub ties the workflow together.
Bring the evidence together before you sign
A charge over IP only protects a lender if the asset is real, the title is clean, the valuation is defensible, and the s.859A filing lands inside 21 days. Assembling that — the register of assets, an orderly-disposal valuation, the collateral-suitability view, and the financials — is exactly what a lender's credit committee wants to see in one pack. Start by getting an IVS-aligned valuation, then use the Lending Readiness Report to package the register, valuation, and collateral assessment your bank will ask for. Get the security created and perfected — and keep your charge on the right side of the liquidator.