Opagio vs Eqvista: Valuation & Equity Platforms
Opagio vs Eqvista — two valuation platforms. 409A vs intangible asset decomposition, cap table, and when each is the right fit.
Opagio and Eqvista occupy overlapping space in founder tooling but are built for different jobs. Eqvista is a US-headquartered cap table + 409A + Real-Time Company Valuation platform. Opagio is a UK-headquartered intangible asset platform providing asset-level decomposition and method-specific valuation across The Opagio 12 taxonomy.
| Criteria | Opagio | Eqvista |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters / primary market | UK-headquartered; UK-primary, multi-jurisdiction roadmap | US-headquartered; US-primary |
| Primary question answered | What intangible assets are driving value, and how are they growing | What is the real-time share price of my company |
| Unit of valuation | Asset — value per intangible asset, aggregated to enterprise value | Share — real-time price tied to the equity register |
| Valuation methods | RFR, MPEEM, With and Without, Cost, DCF, market multiples — aligned to IFRS 3 / IAS 38 / ASC 805 | 409A and Real-Time Company Valuation (per Eqvista's public materials) |
| Intangible asset decomposition | Native — The Opagio 12 with comprehensive library of asset types | Not a primary feature |
| Cap table / equity infrastructure | Not a primary feature; integration roadmap | Core feature — full equity admin (stocks, options, RSUs, warrants, convertibles) |
| 409A support (US) | Not a primary feature | Core feature — top-rated on G2 and Clutch per public materials |
| Audit-aligned PPA support | Asset Valuator output structured for IFRS 3 / IAS 38 / ASC 805 alignment | Not a primary use case |
| IP-backed lending readiness (UK) | Lending Readiness Report — bank-agnostic, supports UK lending market | Not a primary use case |
| Capital pathway coverage | Four pathways: borrow, protect, fundraise, exit | Primarily fundraise + equity admin lifecycle (US-focused) |
| Pricing model | Tiered SaaS subscription — free Forecaster, paid Forecaster Pro, paid Opagio Intangibles | Tiered SaaS subscription — equity admin tiers plus 409A add-on |
| Best fit when | Asset-level intangible decomposition for Series B+, exit prep, PE diligence, IP-backed lending, audit-aligned PPA | US-domiciled startup needing cap table + 409A + real-time valuation in one bundled platform |
When to Use Each Approach
Opagio
- You are UK-domiciled or working under UK-IFRS, global IFRS, or ASC 805 framing
- The conversation is about asset-level intangible decomposition, not share price
- You are preparing for Series B+, exit, PE diligence, or audit-aligned PPA
- IP-backed lending readiness is relevant to your business
Eqvista
- You are US-domiciled and need 409A for option pricing compliance
- Cap table, 409A, and real-time valuation should sit in one integrated product
- The equity admin layer (stocks, options, RSUs, warrants, convertibles) is the substance of your work
- A share-level valuation view fits your current need
Our Verdict
Choose Eqvista for US-domiciled startups needing cap table + 409A + real-time valuation bundled in one product. Choose Opagio when the conversation requires asset-level intangible decomposition for Series B+, exit, PE diligence, IP-backed lending readiness, or audit-aligned PPA work under IFRS 3 / IAS 38 (UK and global) or ASC 805 (US).
Related Glossary Terms
Learn More
Ready to Value Your Intangible Assets?
Use Opagio's valuation tools to apply these methods to your own business.