Opagio vs Inngot — Platforms Compared
Opagio vs Inngot — two UK intangible asset platforms compared on scope, methodology, IP-lending readiness, and when each platform is the right fit.
Opagio and Inngot are the two UK-headquartered platforms most often shortlisted by businesses, advisors, and lenders looking to identify, classify, and value intangible assets. Both serve the same broad market — measuring the 60-70% of enterprise value that does not appear on a conventional balance sheet — but they differ in scope, methodology breadth, ongoing-vs-snapshot orientation, and the way outputs are structured for the buyer.
| Criteria | Opagio | Inngot |
|---|---|---|
| Asset taxonomy | The Opagio 12 — twelve value drivers, comprehensive library of asset types across statutory IP and non-statutory intangibles | Approximately 80 asset types across 6 categories, oriented to statutory and adjacent IP |
| Valuation methodology | Asset Valuator: RFR, MPEEM, With and Without, Cost, DCF, market multiples — IFRS 3 / IAS 38 / ASC 805 aligned | Sollomon: cost, market, and income approaches as a coordinated online tool |
| Time horizon | Continuous — assets and values tracked over time with month-on-month change visibility | Snapshot — per-engagement outputs reflecting a point-in-time assessment |
| Capital pathways covered | Four pathways: borrow, protect, fundraise, exit | Primarily borrow — IP-backed lending readiness is the dominant use case |
| UK bank integration | Lending Readiness Report — bank-agnostic, multi-lender approach | NatWest IP-backed lending programme and HSBC IP lending proposition — established institutional integration |
| Pricing model | Tiered SaaS subscription — free Forecaster, paid Forecaster Pro, paid Opagio Intangibles platform | Per-tool licensing and bespoke engagement fees — not publicly published; quote-based |
| Best fit when | Ongoing intangible asset management across the full asset base; PE/VC portfolio views; lifecycle measurement from seed to exit | An institutionally-recognised IP profile tied to an in-flight NatWest or HSBC IP-backed lending application |
When to Use Each Approach
Opagio
- You need a structured view across the full intangible base, not only the IP slice
- You are managing a portfolio of investee companies (PE, VC, advisor)
- Intangible asset management is continuous — fundraising, exit prep, ongoing value tracking
- The valuation needs to support multiple downstream uses (lending, fundraising, exit, audit)
Inngot
- Your immediate need is a discrete IP audit or one-off IP valuation
- You are in-flight on a NatWest or HSBC IP-backed lending conversation and the bank workflow is wired to Inngot's outputs
- The asset base is primarily statutory IP
- You prefer a tool-specific engagement model over an ongoing platform subscription
Our Verdict
Choose Inngot if your need is a discrete, snapshot-style IP profile and valuation aligned to a specific NatWest or HSBC IP-backed lending application. Choose Opagio if you need a broader intangible asset taxonomy across all twelve value drivers, ongoing measurement rather than a one-off output, and a single platform that supports borrowing, fundraising, exit-readiness, and PE diligence within the same data model.
Related Glossary Terms
Learn More
Ready to Value Your Intangible Assets?
Use Opagio's valuation tools to apply these methods to your own business.