What is the difference between standard and non-standard VC terms?

Full Explanation

Standard terms are market-consensus provisions (weighted-average anti-dilution, protective provisions on major events, 1x liquidation pref); non-standard terms are outliers (full ratchet, excessive pref, veto rights over hiring).

Standard Series A terms in 2024-2026 (UK/EU): 1x liquidation preference (participating, meaning investors get 1x of capital back before founders get anything), weighted-average anti-dilution, protective provisions on M&A/liquidation/capital structure, 1-2 investor board seats, pro-rata rights for Series B, no pay-to-play. Non-standard terms: full ratchet anti-dilution (aggressive), 2x+ pref (onerous), extensive protective provisions (veto over hiring, salary, partnerships), multiple investor board seats (gridlock-inducing), participating preferred with excess participation rights (so investors get 1x + a share of upside above 1x). For founders, standard terms should be your baseline expectation. Non-standard terms signal either: 1) weak negotiating position (you need the capital desperately), 2) a difficult investor (they plan to control the company), or 3) an inexperienced investor (they don't understand market standards). Most top-tier VCs will accept standard terms; if an investor demands non-standard terms, it's usually a yellow flag. For cap table planning, know the difference: standard terms create manageable future dilution; non-standard terms can create catastrophic downside surprises in future rounds.

Related Glossary Terms

Related Questions