Intangible Asset Taxonomies: CHS vs IFRS 3 Classification Explained

Intangible Asset Taxonomies: CHS vs IFRS 3 Classification Explained

Why Intangible Asset Classification Matters

Intangible assets now account for the vast majority of enterprise value in advanced economies, yet the way we classify and measure them depends entirely on which framework we use. Get the classification wrong and you risk undervaluing your company, misallocating investment, or failing a purchase price allocation.

90%+ of S&P 500 market value is intangible
£185.5B UK intangible investment in 2021 (ONS)
2 dominant classification frameworks

Two frameworks dominate the intangible asset landscape, and they serve fundamentally different purposes. Understanding both is essential for any business leader, investor, or advisor working with intangible capital.

★ Key Takeaway

There is no single "correct" taxonomy for intangible assets. The CHS framework serves strategic decision-making; the IFRS 3 / ASC 805 standard serves formal valuations and regulatory compliance. Most companies need both.


The CHS Growth Accounting Framework

The Corrado-Hulten-Sichel (CHS) framework, first published in 2005 and refined through subsequent research, was designed to measure the contribution of intangible investment to economic growth. It groups intangible investment into three pillars: computerised information, innovative property and economic competencies. This guide uses six practical categories that span the three pillars.

Six Practical Categories Across the Three CHS Pillars

Category What It Covers CHS Pillar
Technology Software, platforms, databases, IT infrastructure Computerised Information
Brand & Marketing Brand identity, advertising, customer relationships, market positioning Economic Competencies
Intellectual Property Patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, licensing rights Innovative Property
Design Product design, UX/UI, service design, architectural design Innovative Property
Human Capital Workforce skills, training investment, talent development Economic Competencies
Organizational Capital Management practices, processes, culture, proprietary methodologies Economic Competencies
ℹ Note

Human Capital and Organizational Capital are the two categories that have no equivalent under IFRS 3 or IAS 38. Because accounting standards do not require them to be measured, they are the categories most companies never quantify.

When to Use CHS

The CHS framework is the right choice for strategic and operational decisions. Use it for board strategy sessions, quarterly business reviews, investment prioritisation, and intangible asset questionnaires. It answers the question: where are we investing and what return are we getting?


The IFRS 3 / ASC 805 Accounting Classification

The International Financial Reporting Standard 3 (IFRS 3) and its US equivalent ASC 805 define how intangible assets must be classified in purchase price allocations during business combinations. This is the framework that auditors, tax authorities, and transaction advisors require.

The Five Classes

Class Examples Typical Valuation Method
Marketing-Related Trademarks, trade names, trade dress, domain names, non-competition agreements Relief from Royalty
Customer-Related Customer contracts, customer relationships, order backlog, customer lists Multi-Period Excess Earnings (MPEEM)
Technology-Based Patented and unpatented technology, software, databases, trade secrets, in-process R&D Relief from Royalty / Replacement Cost
Contract-Based Licensing agreements, franchise rights, permits, broadcast rights, lease agreements Income Approach
Artistic-Related Literary works, musical compositions, photographs, video or audiovisual material Income Approach / Relief from Royalty

When to Use IFRS 3

Use this framework for formal valuations, purchase price allocations, annual financial statements, tax amortisation schedules, litigation, and loan collateralisation. It answers the question: what recognised value can we assign to each asset class?

📚 Definition

A purchase price allocation (PPA) is the process of assigning the acquisition price of a business to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Under IFRS 3 and ASC 805, intangible assets must be separately identified and valued as part of this process. Anything left over becomes goodwill.


The Gap Between the Frameworks

Here lies the critical insight: IFRS 3 cannot see everything that CHS measures. Two of the six categories -- Human Capital and Organizational Capital -- have no equivalent under IFRS 3 or ASC 805. In acquisition accounting, these assets are absorbed into goodwill, a single undifferentiated residual.

What IFRS 3 can and cannot see

Asset IFRS 3 Class On Balance Sheet?
Core software platform Technology-Based Only if acquired
Trade name / brand Marketing-Related Only if acquired
Customer contracts Customer-Related Only if acquired
Patent portfolio Technology-Based Only if acquired
Engineering team expertise Not recognised No
Sales playbooks & processes Not recognised No
Training programmes Not recognised No
Internal brand equity (organic) Not recognised No
⚠ Warning

Under IAS 38 and FRS 102, internally generated intangible assets cannot be recognised on the balance sheet at all. This creates a systematic undervaluation of companies that invest heavily in their people, processes, and organic brand development. If your company is knowledge-intensive, your balance sheet may be capturing less than half your actual value.

The Bottom Line

The assets that accounting standards miss are often the most valuable. A company's engineering talent, sales methodology, and management culture frequently drive more value than its patents or customer contracts, yet they are invisible under traditional reporting. This is why growth-stage companies and knowledge-intensive businesses are systematically undervalued.


When to Use Which Framework

The right framework depends on your context. In many situations, you need both.

Scenario Primary Framework Why
Board strategy session CHS Actionable investment decisions
Quarterly business review CHS Track investment vs productivity trends
Series C investor data room Both CHS for strategy narrative; IFRS 3 for valuation support
Purchase price allocation IFRS 3 Required by accounting standards
PE exit preparation Both IFRS 3 for the transaction; CHS for the value creation story
Due diligence response Both IFRS 3 for the numbers; CHS for the context
ESG / CSRD disclosure CHS Human Capital reporting maps directly
Litigation / IP dispute IFRS 3 Courts require recognised valuation standards

Use CHS When You Need To...

  • Decide where to invest next
  • Track productivity impact of intangible spending
  • Report to the board on intangible asset health
  • Tell the value creation story to investors
  • Assess human and organizational capital alongside the rest

Use IFRS 3 When You Need To...

  • Complete a purchase price allocation
  • File audited financial statements
  • Calculate tax amortisation benefits
  • Support litigation or IP disputes
  • Collateralise intangible assets for lending
✔ Example

A PE firm preparing for exit would use the CHS framework to build the value creation narrative for the information memorandum -- showing how intangible investments drove productivity growth over the hold period. Simultaneously, the IFRS 3 classification would be used for the purchase price allocation to give buyers the formal asset breakdown they need for the transaction.


Where Opagio Fits

Opagio Intangibles helps companies and investors identify, measure and value their intangible assets.

Start with the free Quick Assessment

The Opagio 12 Quick Assessment scores your business across the Opagio 12 value drivers, giving a structured view of assets that no balance sheet can show.

Map your Opagio 12 value drivers

Opagio 12 is Opagio's framework. The Opagio 12 value drivers cover modern assets that CHS predates, such as network effects and switching costs, and give a fuller view of data.

Value with recognised methods

Opagio Intangibles values assets with standard methods such as Relief from Royalty, MPEEM and With-and-Without.

Further Reading


David Stroll is a co-founder of Opagio, specialising in macro-economic policy, institutional investment, and IAS 38 compliance. Meet the team.

Share:

DS

David Stroll — Chief Scientist, Co-Founder

PhD in Productivity | 40 years in strategy and technical systems delivery

Meet the Opagio team →

Try it yourself — Valuator

Estimate the value of your intangible assets using industry-standard methods like Relief from Royalty, MPEEM, and With & Without.

Open Valuator →

Related Articles

Growth Stage: Operational Excellence
startups 2026-03-14 · Mark Hillier

Growth Stage: Operational Excellence

From startup to scale-up — operating leverage, R&D capitalisation under IAS 38, management reporting, SOC 2 and ISO 27001 compliance, and EMI share option schemes.

Read more →
Cross-Border Intangible Asset Valuation Challenges
cross-border valuation 2026-04-07 · Tony Hillier

Cross-Border Intangible Asset Valuation Challenges

The practical challenges of valuing intangible assets in cross-border transactions. Covers jurisdictional differences in recognition, transfer pricing complications, currency considerations, and strategies for managing multi-country purchase price allocations.

Read more →

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest insights on intangible asset growth and productivity delivered to your inbox.

Want to learn more about your intangible assets?

Take the free intangible asset assessment to see where your business stands across Opagio 12.