Why Intangible Asset Classification Matters
Intangible assets now account for the vast majority of enterprise value in advanced economies, yet the way we classify and measure them depends entirely on which framework we use. Get the classification wrong and you risk undervaluing your company, misallocating investment, or failing a purchase price allocation.
90%+
of S&P 500 market value is intangible
£185.5B
UK intangible investment in 2021 (ONS)
2
dominant classification frameworks
Two frameworks dominate the intangible asset landscape, and they serve fundamentally different purposes. Understanding both is essential for any business leader, investor, or advisor working with intangible capital.
★ Key Takeaway
There is no single "correct" taxonomy for intangible assets. The CHS framework serves strategic decision-making; the IFRS 3 / ASC 805 standard serves formal valuations and regulatory compliance. Most companies need both.
The CHS Growth Accounting Framework
The Corrado-Hulten-Sichel (CHS) framework, first published in 2005 and refined through subsequent research, was designed to measure the contribution of intangible investment to economic growth. It groups intangible investment into three pillars: computerised information, innovative property and economic competencies. This guide uses six practical categories that span the three pillars.
Six Practical Categories Across the Three CHS Pillars
| Category |
What It Covers |
CHS Pillar |
| Technology |
Software, platforms, databases, IT infrastructure |
Computerised Information |
| Brand & Marketing |
Brand identity, advertising, customer relationships, market positioning |
Economic Competencies |
| Intellectual Property |
Patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, licensing rights |
Innovative Property |
| Design |
Product design, UX/UI, service design, architectural design |
Innovative Property |
| Human Capital |
Workforce skills, training investment, talent development |
Economic Competencies |
| Organizational Capital |
Management practices, processes, culture, proprietary methodologies |
Economic Competencies |
ℹ Note
Human Capital and Organizational Capital are the two categories that have no equivalent under IFRS 3 or IAS 38. Because accounting standards do not require them to be measured, they are the categories most companies never quantify.
When to Use CHS
The CHS framework is the right choice for strategic and operational decisions. Use it for board strategy sessions, quarterly business reviews, investment prioritisation, and intangible asset questionnaires. It answers the question: where are we investing and what return are we getting?
The IFRS 3 / ASC 805 Accounting Classification
The International Financial Reporting Standard 3 (IFRS 3) and its US equivalent ASC 805 define how intangible assets must be classified in purchase price allocations during business combinations. This is the framework that auditors, tax authorities, and transaction advisors require.
The Five Classes
| Class |
Examples |
Typical Valuation Method |
| Marketing-Related |
Trademarks, trade names, trade dress, domain names, non-competition agreements |
Relief from Royalty |
| Customer-Related |
Customer contracts, customer relationships, order backlog, customer lists |
Multi-Period Excess Earnings (MPEEM) |
| Technology-Based |
Patented and unpatented technology, software, databases, trade secrets, in-process R&D |
Relief from Royalty / Replacement Cost |
| Contract-Based |
Licensing agreements, franchise rights, permits, broadcast rights, lease agreements |
Income Approach |
| Artistic-Related |
Literary works, musical compositions, photographs, video or audiovisual material |
Income Approach / Relief from Royalty |
When to Use IFRS 3
Use this framework for formal valuations, purchase price allocations, annual financial statements, tax amortisation schedules, litigation, and loan collateralisation. It answers the question: what recognised value can we assign to each asset class?
📚 Definition
A purchase price allocation (PPA) is the process of assigning the acquisition price of a business to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Under IFRS 3 and ASC 805, intangible assets must be separately identified and valued as part of this process. Anything left over becomes goodwill.
The Gap Between the Frameworks
Here lies the critical insight: IFRS 3 cannot see everything that CHS measures. Two of the six categories -- Human Capital and Organizational Capital -- have no equivalent under IFRS 3 or ASC 805. In acquisition accounting, these assets are absorbed into goodwill, a single undifferentiated residual.
What IFRS 3 can and cannot see
| Asset |
IFRS 3 Class |
On Balance Sheet? |
| Core software platform |
Technology-Based |
Only if acquired |
| Trade name / brand |
Marketing-Related |
Only if acquired |
| Customer contracts |
Customer-Related |
Only if acquired |
| Patent portfolio |
Technology-Based |
Only if acquired |
| Engineering team expertise |
Not recognised |
No |
| Sales playbooks & processes |
Not recognised |
No |
| Training programmes |
Not recognised |
No |
| Internal brand equity (organic) |
Not recognised |
No |
⚠ Warning
Under IAS 38 and FRS 102, internally generated intangible assets cannot be recognised on the balance sheet at all. This creates a systematic undervaluation of companies that invest heavily in their people, processes, and organic brand development. If your company is knowledge-intensive, your balance sheet may be capturing less than half your actual value.
The Bottom Line
The assets that accounting standards miss are often the most valuable. A company's engineering talent, sales methodology, and management culture frequently drive more value than its patents or customer contracts, yet they are invisible under traditional reporting. This is why growth-stage companies and knowledge-intensive businesses are systematically undervalued.
When to Use Which Framework
The right framework depends on your context. In many situations, you need both.
| Scenario |
Primary Framework |
Why |
| Board strategy session |
CHS |
Actionable investment decisions |
| Quarterly business review |
CHS |
Track investment vs productivity trends |
| Series C investor data room |
Both |
CHS for strategy narrative; IFRS 3 for valuation support |
| Purchase price allocation |
IFRS 3 |
Required by accounting standards |
| PE exit preparation |
Both |
IFRS 3 for the transaction; CHS for the value creation story |
| Due diligence response |
Both |
IFRS 3 for the numbers; CHS for the context |
| ESG / CSRD disclosure |
CHS |
Human Capital reporting maps directly |
| Litigation / IP dispute |
IFRS 3 |
Courts require recognised valuation standards |
Use CHS When You Need To...
- Decide where to invest next
- Track productivity impact of intangible spending
- Report to the board on intangible asset health
- Tell the value creation story to investors
- Assess human and organizational capital alongside the rest
Use IFRS 3 When You Need To...
- Complete a purchase price allocation
- File audited financial statements
- Calculate tax amortisation benefits
- Support litigation or IP disputes
- Collateralise intangible assets for lending
✔ Example
A PE firm preparing for exit would use the CHS framework to build the value creation narrative for the information memorandum -- showing how intangible investments drove productivity growth over the hold period. Simultaneously, the IFRS 3 classification would be used for the purchase price allocation to give buyers the formal asset breakdown they need for the transaction.
Where Opagio Fits
Opagio Intangibles helps companies and investors identify, measure and value their intangible assets.
Start with the free Quick Assessment
The Opagio 12 Quick Assessment scores your business across the Opagio 12 value drivers, giving a structured view of assets that no balance sheet can show.
Map your Opagio 12 value drivers
Opagio 12 is Opagio's framework. The Opagio 12 value drivers cover modern assets that CHS predates, such as network effects and switching costs, and give a fuller view of data.
Value with recognised methods
Opagio Intangibles values assets with standard methods such as Relief from Royalty, MPEEM and With-and-Without.
Further Reading
David Stroll is a co-founder of Opagio, specialising in macro-economic policy, institutional investment, and IAS 38 compliance. Meet the team.