CHS Framework vs IFRS 3 Classification
CHS economic taxonomy vs IFRS 3 accounting classification for intangible assets. Strategic investment analysis versus compliance-driven PPA categories.
The Corrado-Hulten-Sichel (CHS) framework and IFRS 3 classification represent two fundamentally different ways of categorising intangible assets. CHS was developed by economists to measure intangible investment across the economy; IFRS 3 was designed by accountants to ensure faithful recognition in business combinations. Understanding both is essential for anyone bridging the gap between strategic asset management and financial reporting.
| Criteria | Corrado-Hulten-Sichel (CHS) Framework | IFRS 3 Classification |
|---|---|---|
| Origin | Academic economics (Corrado, Hulten, Sichel, 2005/2009) | Accounting standards (IASB) |
| Purpose | Measure total intangible investment (including unrecognised) | Classify acquired intangible assets for balance sheet recognition |
| Categories | 6: Computerised information, innovative property, economic competencies (each split into 2) | 5: Marketing-related, customer-related, artistic-related, contract-based, technology-based |
| Scope | All intangible investment — including internally generated and expensed items | Only acquired intangible assets meeting separability or contractual-legal test |
| Workforce treatment | Included (as firm-specific human capital under economic competencies) | Excluded — assembled workforce subsumed in goodwill |
| Typical user | Economists, strategists, boards, growth-stage companies | Auditors, valuers, CFOs, acquirers in M&A transactions |
When to Use Each Approach
Corrado-Hulten-Sichel (CHS) Framework
- Strategic planning and intangible asset investment tracking
- Board-level reporting on intangible capital growth
- Benchmarking intangible investment against industry peers
- Productivity analysis and growth accounting
IFRS 3 Classification
- Purchase price allocation following a business combination
- Financial statement preparation under IFRS
- Impairment testing of acquired intangible assets
- Regulatory compliance and audit defence
Our Verdict
These frameworks are complementary, not competing. Use CHS for strategic investment visibility — it captures the full spectrum of intangible capital including items accounting standards ignore. Use IFRS 3 classification for compliance in business combinations. The most effective approach uses both: CHS for management decisions, IFRS 3 for financial reporting.
Related Glossary Terms
Learn More
Ready to Value Your Intangible Assets?
Use Opagio's valuation tools to apply these methods to your own business.