What is the difference between a formal valuation and an indicative valuation?

Full Explanation

The distinction between formal and indicative valuations matters for both cost and purpose. A formal valuation (also called a full or comprehensive valuation) is prepared in accordance with professional standards (IVSC, RICS, ASA), follows a rigorous methodology, includes detailed analysis of every key assumption, presents full sensitivity analysis, and is designed to withstand scrutiny from auditors, regulators, tax authorities, or courts. It is required for financial reporting (PPA under IFRS 3), impairment testing (IAS 36), tax filings, and litigation. Formal valuations typically require 6-12 weeks and cost £25,000-£100,000+. An indicative valuation (also called a desktop or preliminary valuation) provides a directional estimate of intangible asset value using simplified methods and limited data. It may rely on industry benchmarks, rule-of-thumb multiples, or high-level income projections without the depth of a formal analysis. Indicative valuations are useful for strategic planning (understanding the approximate value of your intangible assets before a deal), board presentations (providing context for investment decisions), early-stage deal negotiations (establishing a valuation range before committing to a full engagement), and internal budgeting (estimating post-acquisition amortisation charges). Indicative valuations cost £5,000-£15,000 and can be completed in 1-3 weeks. Opagio's tools sit on the indicative side of this line. The free Intangible Asset Valuator estimates an enterprise value from an EBITDA multiple, and the Asset Valuator in Opagio Intangibles values individual assets with a method you choose. They can help you understand your intangible asset position before you engage professional advisors, but they are not formal valuations: Opagio is not a valuer, and its outputs are not a signed valuation or a valuation of record.

Related Glossary Terms

Related Questions